.
Feedback

Local Lawmakers Split on Special Ed Legislation

Educators across the state of New York are urging Gov. Andrew Cuomo to veto a bill that would force districts to take home life and cultural environments into account when making special education placements.

New York educators are asking Gov. Andrew Cuomo to veto a bill that would change the way special education placements are made.

Opponents of the measure, Special Education Bill S.7722, point to a number of problems with it, among them placing place financial and administrative burden on schools.

Schools would have to take a student's home life and cultural environment into account when making placement decisions under the bill, passed by state lawmakers last month.

Assemblywoman Ellen Jaffee (D-Suffern) voted against the bill.

"While I support the needs of special education students, the legislation will impose financial and legal challenges to our public school districts," Jaffee said. "Therefore, I voted against it."

State Senator David Carlucci (D-Rockland) voted for the bill, but when asked did not express strong support for it.

"Over the past few weeks, I have met individually with many local advocates and concerned residents over the apparent fiscal implications associated with the bill," Carlucci said. "I have expressed these concerns and spoken to the governor's office so that they may be addressed in a thoughtful and balanced approach."

The measure would speed up the placement process and require districts to reimburse parents for tuition payments made by parents to private schools not approved by the state within 30 days. Opponents have called it a voucher system.

The Council of New York Special Education Administrators (CNYSEA) and the Long Island Association of Special Education Administrators (LIASEA) both sent letters to Cuomo outlining their concerns with the bill and asking him to veto it. Copies of both letters are attached to this report.

The CNYSEA letter highlighted the following issues:

  • This legislation places new obligations on Committees on Special Education, not required by federal law.
  • It creates a new standard that is vague and wide open to differing
    interpretations for determining whether a proposed placement is designed to offer a child with a disability in New York a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE).
  • It appears to extend the authority of school boards to enter into agreements to reimburse those parents who can afford the outlay of tuition to no approved private schools in the absence of any amendment to other sections of the law that currently prohibit it.
  • It circumvents a carefully crafted legal process established by federal law to address such claims.

They also claim that the language is too vague, which can create issues in the interpretation of the legislation. They argue that there is already opportunity in the current process to take cultural and family backgrounds of special needs students into account in regards to their placement and that it ignores some existing laws and contradicts others.

The CNYSEA claims that the law "creates a voucher program for parents who can afford to pay private school tuition and wait to receive reimbursement."

The LIASEA also refers to the measure as a voucher program as well as calling it a return to segregation.

"Further, not only are school districts being forced to return to segregation, this new legislation amounts to New York State’s first voucher program," They wrote in the letter to Cuomo. "This voucher program will only serve to benefit the wealthy, as only wealthy parents can afford to pay private, non-approved tuition and await for
reimbursement. As a result of the new legislation, districts will be obligated to consider a student’s cultural background, and therefore his or her religious preferences."

The letter refers to the measure as a "merging of church and state interests" and argues that it circumvents the appeals process mandated on the state and federal level.

The following schools have passed resolutions calling for Cuomo to veto the legislation:

  • Bedford Central Schools
  • Blind Brook-Rye UFSD
  • Brewster CSD
  • Chappaqua CSD
  • Croton-Harmon UFSD
  • Eastchester UFSD
  • Haldane CSD
  • Harrison CSD
  • Katonah-Lewisboro UFSD
  • Lakeland CSD
  • Ossining UFSD
  • Pelham UFSD
  • Pleasantville UFSD
  • Pocantico Hills CSD
  • Putnam/N. Westchester BOCES
  • S. Westchester BOCES

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pearl River Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Pat July 20, 2012 at 10:02 am
Another "Monsey based initiative" that will have us paying even more to educate their kids at "private" Yeshivas. Thanks for your support Carlucci.
John Roache July 20, 2012 at 11:00 am
Carlucci will never get my vote again and I will work to have him ousted. Another sell out to the Hasids in exchange for 6,000 votes. It did not take long for this young pup to figure out whats best for him at the expense of the taxpayer.
John Roache July 20, 2012 at 11:34 am
Carlucci's office released a press release today about him co-sponsoring a bill on boater safety. Quick learner he is. Come outin favor of a bill that virtually no one is in favor of except for the Hasidics and himself for his own political interests and then put out a press release about boater safety which will affect less than %1 percent of the taxpayers. The bill on special ed will cost everyone a small fortune. Nice distraction. The sad thing is %95 of the taxpayer population do not have a clue as to what is going on. They just expect their taxes to go up. Politicians bank on that.
Margaret McKee July 20, 2012 at 11:54 am
Shame on you, David .......the amount of votes you'd get will not surpass those you'd lose....reconsider.......
Liz July 20, 2012 at 12:08 pm
Why is it only Westchester and Putnam districts that have opposed the legislation? Why are there no Rockland schools represented?
Elaine July 20, 2012 at 12:44 pm
Though I don't agree with everything that has been proposed, I do feel the entire special education evaluation system needs to be revamped. If a student has severe issues, many modifications are clear cut. However, is a student is borderline they often do not receive what is needed. Rule #1 for an IEP, is that the goals and objectives be specific and measurable. That rule is hardly enforced. This law should also be more specific and measurable. Something that also needs to be reviewed is the definition of a FAPE. In our case, we were told that the district did provide my son with a FAPE because he passed all his classes. Really? He actually did not pass, they just moved him to a lower level and do we really just want our kids to just pass? Our standards should be much higher. To read about more behind the scenes of the Special Ed system, see actual hearing transcripts, and read excerpts please look up my new book unREAL Education: Beyond Report Cards on amazon & BN. www.unrealeducation.com or facebook.com/unrealeducation.
John Roache July 20, 2012 at 12:50 pm
Well said Margaret McKee. You are woman with principles.
Even David Carlucci knows it and honored you for being a great citizen. He should consult with you before he makes these dopey decisions. Thank you. "Margaret McKee truly embodies what it means to be a citizen activist and leader in the community,” said Senator Carlucci. “Her recognition today is well deserved and its significance is heightened due to her statewide achievement. Rockland County is truly blessed to call her one of our own.”
Watchdog July 20, 2012 at 01:30 pm
ROCKLAND IS DOOMED. The Hasids and their brothers in Solidarity, the Unions vote in tandem for the same politicians and they get what they want but the final result is the ruination of Rockland County. Vote them out you say? AHA, we had the choice between Carlucci, who is beginning to look like another corrupted, weak kneed position and Vanderhoef who is a corrupted weak kneed and incompetent politician.
Only hope here is to oust Vinny RedApa ang get some new blood in the Republican Party so at least we will have a choice. DOOMSDAY IS COMING.
John Roache July 20, 2012 at 01:40 pm
Ah the internet!! Turns out old Dave is married to Lauren Grossberg, special education teacher at a Orthodox Jewish School in New Jersey!! Now the big picture is becoming a little bit clearer!! See below from the Journal News:
Grossberg, also a Rockland native, works at the Moriah School in Englewood, N.J., a private school, where she teaches 4th grade and 5th grade special education students.
Watchdog July 20, 2012 at 02:28 pm
You need a big calculator to add up the amount of money the Hasids take from the Town, County and school system. If they were Italian instead of Jewish, the Attorney General would be prosecuting them under RICO.,
Culpsa July 20, 2012 at 11:02 pm
When you start reimbursement programs for educations you are saying that the present public education is ineffective. Issuing vouchers will not correct the situation. I also agree, that the public will then be footing the bill for the selected few to receive a private education. Not good!!
joe kelley July 21, 2012 at 12:23 am
Cuomo will sign it. That's who he is. He could care less about education. He and the senator need to go come next election.
Andrew July 21, 2012 at 03:08 pm
I don't know why so many are complaining about "Hassids" as being use of the money perhaps to give some public money to their private schools. Fact is, by the Hassids not putting their children in Public Schools, just like the Catholics who send their kids to private Catholic Schools, in fact the Public SAVES ALOT OF MONEY. Public Schools in Rockland spend $20,000 or more per kid. We pay alot less towards kids in Religious Private Schools. So actually even if we gave $5,000 per child to help the Private Schools, we'd come out ahead, vs. the $20,000+ taxpayers must fund on each kid in Public Schools.
Andromachos July 22, 2012 at 03:05 pm
More like 8000 votes, but yeah.
Ryan Buncher (Editor) July 22, 2012 at 06:33 pm
Folks, please see our Terms of Service and try to keep things civil here. Thank you.
Mike July 22, 2012 at 08:25 pm
Huge difference between the Catholic parents and the Hassidic community though. Catholics when they did send their kids to Catholic schools (not the case anymore) never voted en masse or via block to defeat public school budgets. We paid our tuition and still voted to fund the public schools. I have no problem with Hassidic Community wanting to send their kids to any school they want, but I think it is absolutely awful that they continually defund their local school district.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 14, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ann Marie!
Watchdog June 19, 2013 at 01:20 am
How much are the TAXES? When you include the monthly payment for the taxes, this home REALLY costsRead More about $1,299,000.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 10:04 am
Hi Cal - thanks for posting this! Can you let folks know how to vote? Is there a website for theRead More organization?
Aerial of United Water's proposed treatment plant
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:10 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
Mike June 8, 2013 at 01:29 pm
I think this would be a great question to pose to our current President and his Attorney General inRead More light of the massive abuse they are inflicting upon our liberties at this exact moment.
Ken McQuade May 30, 2013 at 04:04 pm
Nothing wrong here it is all good The students of East Ramapo should be proud of what they did !Read More Ramapo was such a great school back in the 70's It hurts me to see what it has become. Keep the faith ! GO Gryphons and Tigers!