.
Feedback

Pearl River Schools Face Budget Cuts for 2013-14

The Pearl River School District's building principals and administrators presented possible cuts that could be necessary to make up a projected $1.7 million shortfall in the 2013-14 district budget at Tuesday's board of education meeting.

Concerned teachers, parents and administrators packed the meeting room at the Pearl River School District's administration building Tuesday to hear about the 2013-14 budget, including potential cuts in programs and personnel.

The district administration asked the five building principles and the directors of athletics, special services and facilities to present options for cuts within their buildings or departments as part of a presentation at the board of education meeting.

Pearl River Director of Operations Quinton Van Wynen is projecting a $1.7 million shortfall in the district budget for 2013-14, with even larger deficits for 2014-15 ($2.4 million) and 2015-16 ($2.6 million). He said that by making the cuts now, things should be easier in the two years that follow, but there are unknown variables such as state financial aid and increases in health care and insurance costs. 

"Budgeting has changed dramatically in New York State," Van Wynen said. "We no longer look at programs and say what can we add. Now it's how much money do we have and what can we do with it?

"I've got a three-year plan here and I'm not sure that is enough. Things aren't getting better. There are more pressures coming from Washington and Albany that we have to deal with."

Van Wynen and Pearl River Superintendent of Schools Dr. John Morgano both pointed out that Pearl River is in better shape than many other districts, in part because it has fund balance to fall back on. Van Wynen's three-year plan calls for the spending of approximately $1.5 million in reserves over that time period. 

"We happen to be a district that has lived cautiously over the last number of years," Van Wynen said. "We put money aside. We have reserves.

"As Dr. Morgano said. we may have problems and we may be swimming hard to stay ahead of the tide, but many districts in this state are drowning already."

The potential cuts presented Tuesday night represented 16.8 full-time employees (some were part-time positions) and approximately $1.3 million. 

"If you are the person losing your job, it's awful," Morgano said. "I lost my job when I worked in New York City and the city went broke. It was no consolation to me that other people had their jobs."

Morgano said that each principal and director was given a dollar amount and asked to find cuts to reach that number.

"The principals, this was a struggle for them,"  Morgano said. "They agonized over this because this is the heart of their program. They had to look at what was not mandated. Not mandated does not mean not important. Just because something isn't required by law doesn't mean it isn't good for kids. We simply can't magically do away with a $1.7 million problem."

Van Wynen said there are still variables in place for the 2013-14 budget, such as the specifics of state aid and the potential impact of the retirement incentive the district announced last week. 

Among the cuts suggested Tuesday:

Elementary Schools (Principals Peggy Lynch of Evans Park, Maureen Alaimo of Franklin Ave. and Kathleenann Cool of Lincoln Ave.) 

  • Delay band and orchestra until fifth grade (middle school), cutting a 0.6 FTE (full-time employee). Students will continue to be introduced to instruments in general music classes.
  • Eliminate PREP enrichment program and 1.5 FTE that goes with it. Students will participate in JET programs as part of homeroom.
  • Eliminate librarians in the elementary schools, cutting 1.5 FTE. The library clerks will remain so the libraries can remain open during the school day.

Pearl River Middle School (Principal Maria Paese)

  • Modify current IEP practices to eliminate five teaching assistant positions. Plan includes establishing a testing center with two full-time teaching assistants to allow for test modification compliance.
  • Eliminate Challenge/Learning Center
  • Eliminate part-time audio-visual operator, whose responsibilities will be taken over by library staff
  • Eliminate machine operator, with teachers and office staff taking over those responsibilities.

Pearl River High School (Principal William Furdon)

  • Restructure math labs and class sizes to save on one full-time employee
  • Eliminate Microsoft Suite course, which would lead to reduction of one social studies teacher. 
  • Eliminate Grade 8 Studio Art/Tech Design courses
  • Move Careers course to eighth grade, with students in grades 9-12 taking alternate electives.
  • Reduce sections of World Language, increasing the class sizes. 

Special Services (Director Carolyn Moffa)

  • Eliminate Consortium Class
  • Reduce .5 school psychologists, spreading work among those who remain.
  • Reduce .5 in speech therapists, which would eliminate non-mandated services including assistance to St. Margaret School.

Athletics (Director Todd Santabarbara)

  • Eliminate freshman baseball, boys basketball and winter dance teams, which would likely reduce number of ninth graders participating in athletics. 
  • Eliminate single-game stipends including football cameraman, adult supervision for junior varsity and modified events, scorekeepers for away games.
  • Reduce number of officials at track meets, which could make them longer. 
  • Eliminate morning fitness center and open gym at the high school.
  • Reduce spending for tournament entry fees.

Facilities (Director Bob Nelan)

  • Upgrade machinery with one-time $50,000 cost and keep more maintenance work internal, saving approximately $30,000 per year.
  • Decrease overtime by 10%, which may include not opening district buildings on Sundays.
Mike January 23, 2013 at 12:13 pm
Looks like Principal and the PRMS in conjunction with the Special Ed department will continue to decimate whatever semblance of a program they have for students with varying learning problems. Paese comment about IEP reduction is a joke. PRSD has already severely limited granting IEPs to students who need them. My challenge to the Board at PR, provide the community with a comparison right now of how the PRSD compares to neighboring districts in servicing and educating students with special needs. This is a joke. Parents, wake up! Start going to board meetings and demand accountability. This plan is unacceptable....business decisions overriding educational ones. Why doesn't each one of these so called administrators take pay cuts so we can have the right programs for our kids. The rank and file teachers have done so, but the high paid administratirs continue to take emormous salaries. Parents, stand up or your kids will fall behind.
jim January 23, 2013 at 12:41 pm
Jim
Funny, i don't see any administrators being cut.
Siobhan January 23, 2013 at 01:06 pm
The tragedy here is how our tax money is being spent.
This year Orangetown followed the lead of Clarkstown in handing out a 13% increase over five years to police who are already making high six figure salaries. Had our elected representatives taken a different approach with the police they could have perhaps offered some financial help to the schools. I would not object to the cops being paid less and the schools being given more. I will note that Supervisor Stewart was the only one to vote against giving the police any more money. Further, Broadacres remains open and is bleeding cash! Again Supervisor Stewart has voted to close Broadacres. Troy and Diviny did not! Why are tax dollars funding a golf course and not the education of our children? I ask these questions not of Supervisor Stewart but of Councilmen Troy, Diviny, Valentine and Morr. Something has gone wrong here with political priorities. Of course, Orangetown could pretend it is Clarkstown and just bond everything. The Clarkstown supervisor simply bonds everything so a future generation can pay for his debt after he has gone off to some comfortable retirement. Clarkstown's debt is now over 100 million dollars and rising but no one there seems to care while expensive stone walls are being put up along their roads and fancy walkways around Congers Lake (bonded, of course, to the tune of 5 million bucks to finish it).
baligirl January 23, 2013 at 01:33 pm
i am so disappointed with top school administration at pearl river. the kids suffer while they take home a HEFTY salary. why not take a pay cut to offset the deficit. the amount of school taxes that we pay is criminal to the programs that the kids receive! how many top administrators does the district really need? i agree with the above comment from Mike, people in pearl river/orangeburg better step up and attend school board & town meetings once a month....otherwise you will end up with the disaster in east ramapo.
The Merm January 23, 2013 at 01:53 pm
Siobhan-You are talking apples and oranges here. Property taxes support town services, police, parks, roads, sewer, etc. School taxes support the schools. The two are separate, and one has nothing to do with the other.
Mike January 23, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Where is the PR PTA and SEPTA on this? Have they become completely co-opted by the district. If so, then perhaps parents need to form their own ad hoc committees. Bottom line folks is there is less money for everything and if you don't fight and demand value then you will not get it. Again, where is the Board? We voted you in and you idly stand by and allow this to happen. Shame on you
Siobhan January 23, 2013 at 02:06 pm
The Merm --- Your comment is somewhat facetious. I know what taxes go to probably in more detail than you since I have studied the budgets of Orangetown, Clarkstown and the County. It seems to me that the same taxpayer is paying for the apples AND the oranges. I want less golf and police apples and more of school oranges in Orangetown. This is the taxpayers' money NOT the Town or the School money. My point is we need to change spending priorities here fast and put tax money where it is most needed and best utilized. Taxpayers do not want school taxes AND town taxes to go up. They want the town portion that is spent on the police and the golf course to go DOWN and the school taxes can then go UP by an equivalent amount. Is this unclear?
Mike January 23, 2013 at 02:08 pm
I agree with your statement, but these are two different issues. You are referencing the Town and County taxes and issues, but this article is specific to the school district, it taxes and now cutting of services to children who need it most. Its about a district who prides itself on. "Corporate Approach" to it finances and operations, yet that goes out the window when evaluating the "managers" (i.e. administrators) in running the district. Again, can we see distinct and separate data on our the PRSD handles its special ed students and how they fare compared to other districts. Lets look at real data and see if we get true value for our ax dollars.. The management team here has deftly moved the responsibility of educating these students from e district onto the parents.
Mike January 23, 2013 at 02:15 pm
Sioban, I like your idea....just wonder how it can be done from a legal perspective under NYS law. I am not an expert here, but I would expect it might be difficult to get out the silo based mentality we have f two different tax bases. I think it is worth exploring your idea of one pool f taxes to cover all services, including schools. Of course, the challenge for Orangetown would be how to handle the fact that we have all or portions of 3 separate school districts within our borders. Maybe consolidating districts is art of the answer to the wasted and duplicative management in our school districts? Any lawyers or state experts out there that can provide thoughts and comments on this idea?
Reality January 23, 2013 at 02:44 pm
Hey Siobhan who died and made you king?? What is "unclear" is who the hell do you think you are to state something like " they want the town portion spent on police and the golf course to go DOWN and the school taxes can go up by the equivalent amount". Why do you think you can speak for the taxes payers in otown? Maybe you should go back an do more research. I know hundreds of senior citizens who haven't had kids in the school system for decades, enjoy playing golf, and rely on the police services that would adamantly disagree with you!
Jimmy January 23, 2013 at 02:58 pm
Just raise the taxes over 2% and get on with it. Buildings are falling down classes are being cut. Raise it and move on.
CR January 23, 2013 at 03:23 pm
Or we could seriously think about reducing pension and other benefits for all teachers and administrators. And throw in a reduction in pension and benefits for the police to make Siobhan happy too. A very small percentage reduction would save millions.
NYC Teacher January 23, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Isn't it possible that the school district is doing all that they can with the choices that are available? How can we judge whether the district needs, or doesn't need, all their administrators? I think that additional data for IEP comparisons would be beneficial but, if the school districts plan does not materially change the present plan with its changes/reductions, why should one group of students obtain more benefit than any other group in the district? As a parent of HS students who will be impacted by these decisions directly, I am unhappy with many of the changes offered, but I also accept that cuts are necessary and, unfortunately, a part of our world today. School taxes are school taxes, so to speak, so bringing into this a compilation of taxes throughout the County, which would then avail us of the property taxes, is unrealistic. Reductions in costs need to be for the present items too, as commitments already made [i.e. pension benefits] cannot now be changed. Hopefully, as our school board and present administration continue to work through these issues, responsible choices will continue to be made for the benefit of all of our students needs within the district.
PR Parent January 23, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Is our high school so tough that we need three administrators there? What does Furdon do all day besides shake hands during the morning rush hour? Has he ever returned an email or phone call? Does he need two assistants to stand around and watch kids eat their lunch? How many kids are actually suspended or sent out of class. Seems to me we have pretty nice kids here in Pearl River????? So why not cut an administrator and save a teacher who actually works directly with kids?
Mike January 23, 2013 at 05:27 pm
It may indeed be possible they are doing "all they can", but the lack of openess and transparency around how the district administers the programs for children with varying educational needs is troubling. I am not suggesting nor do I see it as helpful to pit one group of students vs. another as budget challenges increase. Under NYS law, however, every child is entitled to a fair and equitable education and some children will require more resources. I am suggesting is that the PRSD should provide us with a Comparative Effectivenss type analysis on how our district educates it educationally challenged students. Bottom line questions of are we getting the best value and outcomes for our tax dollars. If other districts are doing a better job and have better outcomes why not follow them as a best practice? Right now, it appears the program in PRSD is a "black box". I'm asking who reviews it, who evaluates it, who ensures that our students are getting the best education possible, and last who ensures that taxpayers are getting their best value. And one final comment, I think if you asked most parents in the PRSD who have children with educational challenges, they would tell you that the ditrict has alreday shifted a significant portion of the financl burden for educating these children onto the parents. So, its not so much cutting resources from one group to another, but more shifting of the burden away from where it belongs to parents. Is this fair? Is this equitable?
kevin January 23, 2013 at 05:59 pm
Pr is already behind times... cut more programs and really fall behind more... Too top heavy cut from the top down...Save on money.. Cut freshman sports and see what happens to those kids??? Drugs and drinking...
Siobhan January 23, 2013 at 06:14 pm
Reality, what you need is a reality check.
First, what I think you want to say is "Hey Siobhan who died and made you QUEEN?" Second, as to "who the HELL do you think you are ----" I am a senior citizen who plays golf at Broadacres and I have put children through the schools with my taxes. I also rely on the police services. The facts remain, the police are overcompensated, and those who wish to play golf should do so at their OWN expense and not at the expense of the taxpayers. That includes me! I would put the needs of children and the needs of "special-needs" children ahead of a golf course given that 1/2 a mile away from Broadacres there is a 27 hole course. I will repeat what I said - there is a critical tax base - property taxes - which to a large extent pays for the county, town, and school taxes. The county is using part of the property taxes to pay for a police mounted patrol, the town is using part to give excessive raises to highly compensated police while the educational system of the town and the USA is falling apart and behind. The priorities of the politicians need a reality check too. If you wish to conduct a rational discussion then do not disgrace yourself with statements such as "Who died and made you king" and while you are at it your points can be made without the use of the word "hell".
Johnny January 23, 2013 at 08:14 pm
You see I would agree with you that Broadacres is bleeding money and even being an avid golfer, should be shut down. But unfortunately you forget how much revenue Blue Hill and Broadacres used to take in. If the town had half a brain and re-invested the money into the courses, the money that THEY made, instead of taking it for other projects, the courses would be in much better condition physically and financially. The town wanted to do it this way so now they have to live with repercussions.
Maureen January 23, 2013 at 09:04 pm
Agree with PR Parent. The district ran fine with one (effective, working) principal and one (effective, working) assistant principal. Cutting the dead wood and eliminating the redundancy could save at least one 6 digit salary. That would fund alot of programs for the kids.
taxpayer January 23, 2013 at 09:27 pm
If you go on see through ny.net and look up the superintendent's and all the other staffs pay including all the stipends they receive; it is outrageous. Teachers too get stipends for everything. Dedication my foot. Its a cash cow.
John January 23, 2013 at 10:57 pm
The admin salaries are higher than NY and NJ governors check seethoughny website over the past five years PR admin salaries have rose 25-30% thats ridiculous for this economy in the public sector and yes ia agree cut the assist principal when I attended, there was only one also when checking salaries, one must add another 40-50 thousand for health insurance fica retirement costs and general cost of carrying an employee so cutting the assist principal and his staff would save over 300K
MichaelG January 24, 2013 at 02:48 am
As the parent of a student with an IEP in the district, I find it amazing that PRMS school Principal Paese ($182k) wants to cut lowly paid aides, the major resource for students with learning difficulties in the classroom, while the ultimate do-nothing, Director of Special Ed, Carolyn Moffa ($170k down the drain), also proposes further gutting of an already inadequate program. Eliminate Consortium Class? Why not take a pay cut Ms. Moffa and Ms. Paese? You're being compensated way out-of-line with the return you bring our community. Too many administrators in this district with no concern other than continuing to keep their cushy overpaid jobs. FInally, if they want to cut the very limited services that are provided to Saint Margarets, please be prepared to have all those kids transfer into PRSD. That will cost a lot more that providing speech therapy to a few children. Ms. Paese, your job is to bring an effective education to all the children in your care, not crippling their chances while "remaining in compliance". What a pathetic administrators cop-out.
Mike January 24, 2013 at 03:40 am
This is why it's incumbent upon the Board to ask much tougher questions of the Special Ed and building principals on how they will meet the needs of students. I agree these are outrageously overpaid salaries and again ask the Board for a comparative to other districts. Where is the PTA and where is SEPTA.? I think most parents in the PRSD have had the same experience and feel much the same way as you Michael. The only way we will get change and the only way to protect our kids is to mobilize and start going to Board meetings.
Larry January 24, 2013 at 11:50 pm
Check out the board minutes from 7/10/12 and see the numerous stipends.At the end of these minutes (of which I have a copy) was the resolutions where the Director of Human Resources, Director of School Facilites, Asst. Supt for Curriculum and Intstruction and Director of Operations were all given a 2% raise effective July 1,2012. Every bargaining unit took a pay cut while they gave themselves a raise. These resolutions have mysteriously disappeared from the minutes. What are they trying to hide???
Taxpayer January 25, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Taxpayer:
I also agree that the administrative salaries are off the charts, but I do disagree with the opinion regarding special education in Pearl River. I too had a child who required and IEP, and also had many other friends in other school districts. Our district is VERY gererous in providing services to our special needs children. Other districts stick to the States Requirements and guidelines and simply just say no. Special Education is driven by State Laws, and a child who does not qualify by the States guidelines is not eligible to receive special education services. It is then the school building and the PARENTS responsibility to help educate thle child. I am afraid that with so many families needing to have both parents work, that the mindset of many parents seem to expect the school district to pick up some of the slack that parents did, such as helping with studying, homework, and providing tutors if our child needed one. A child who is borderline and struggling is not necessarily eligible to recieve special education services. Again, the reqirements are governed by New York State Education Laws.
Harvey Cedars January 25, 2013 at 03:23 pm
I agree with the closer look at the admin costs at the top. What are their contracts like? Can any of the admin folks be subject to a reduced salary or furlough?
Mike January 26, 2013 at 03:47 am
I think most parents in PRSD who have kids with learning disabilities have similar experiences as Michael G and those of Taxpayer are the exception. We have talked with lots of parents who have a child with similar needs as ours both in and outside of PRSD and the overwhelming majority are not happy with special Ed services in PRSD. And without exception, parents in other districts are very satisfied with the services their children receive. Lots of arrogance and little sense of doing what is right for the child. Again why doesn't the School Board show leadership and do a comparison of PRSD any other districts?
John January 27, 2013 at 02:16 am
I see that many people share the same concerns regarding admin salaries as I do I also agree that these people are over paid and someone like Ms Moffa would never make that kind of money in the real world check back and see the increases over the past 4 years more than 40K and she spent many months out sick while being fully paid and not just her cut each admin by 15-20K and save 6 teaching assnt positions
LS January 27, 2013 at 02:57 am
I'm confused, why would they consider cutting freshman sports and not modified.....can someone explain???
jjdjt January 28, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Its assumed that freshman ports can dissolve into JV. Where as modified students (7th-8th grade) would have no sport to play.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pearl River Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 14, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ann Marie!
Watchdog June 19, 2013 at 01:20 am
How much are the TAXES? When you include the monthly payment for the taxes, this home REALLY costsRead More about $1,299,000.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 10:04 am
Hi Cal - thanks for posting this! Can you let folks know how to vote? Is there a website for theRead More organization?
Aerial of United Water's proposed treatment plant
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:10 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
Mike June 8, 2013 at 01:29 pm
I think this would be a great question to pose to our current President and his Attorney General inRead More light of the massive abuse they are inflicting upon our liberties at this exact moment.
Ken McQuade May 30, 2013 at 04:04 pm
Nothing wrong here it is all good The students of East Ramapo should be proud of what they did !Read More Ramapo was such a great school back in the 70's It hurts me to see what it has become. Keep the faith ! GO Gryphons and Tigers!